
Academics have long been accused of jargon-filled writing that is impossible to understand. A recent cautionary tale was that of Ally Louks, a researcher who set off a social media storm with an innocuous post on X celebrating the completion of her PhD. If it was Ms Louks’s research topic (“olfactory ethics”—the politics of smell) that caught the attention of online critics, it was her verbose thesis abstract that further provoked their ire. In two weeks, the post received more than 21,000 retweets and 100m views.
This article appeared in the Science & technology section of the print edition under the headline “Hot air”
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Little is known about the effects on humans—but limiting exposure to them seems prudent
That probably assisted their evolutionary diversification
Whether it is a negotiating ploy remains to be seen
It is better than freezing them to death
Genetic engineering and AI are powering the search for antivenins
It won’t hurt to try. But scientists are only beginning to understand the links between the breath and the mind
To enhance your experience and ensure our website runs smoothly, we use cookies and similar technologies.
Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2025. All rights reserved.

More Stories
Adaptability and Resilience: Q&A with New Board Chair Brian Haberman
Community Snapshot—July
Carrying the Light of the Internet Forward: A Farewell Message from Board Chair Ted Hardie