Click here to sign in with or
Forget Password?
Learn more
share this!
2
Twit
Share
Email
July 11, 2024
This article has been reviewed according to Science X’s editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content’s credibility:
fact-checked
trusted source
proofread
by Kiah Collier, University of Texas at Austin
Whether it’s a pharmacy, a supermarket, or a clothier, when you walk into a retail store in the U.S., you are sure to encounter a flashy promotional display featuring products from a specific brand.
It’s a marketing strategy that’s been proven to be highly effective at boosting sales. Brands carefully plan display campaigns, signing contracts with retailers that specify when to install the exhibits and for how long. They often provide financial incentives to encourage compliance.
But a new study from Ashish Agarwal and Ioannis Stamatopoulos, both associate professors of information, risk, and operations management at Texas McCombs, reveals a major problem with the strategy: the stores. They’re failing to place promotional displays according to plan—or at all.
The study, titled “Promotional Inventory Displays: An Empirical Analysis Using IoT Data,” is published in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management.
In the past, it’s been difficult to fully monitor compliance by individual stores, Agarwal says, making penalties a rarity.
“If you have thousands of stores, how do you know it’s being done well and correctly?” he asks. “In the old setup, the only way to do it is by running audits, and that’s very expensive and it’s very ad hoc.”
For this study, however, he found a new and comprehensive data source: internet of things (IoT) technology, which embeds sensors in displays to provide real-time reporting over the internet.
Agarwal and Stamatopoulos—along with Jacob Zeng of Gonzaga University—worked with a startup company that deploys IoT to help retailers. It provided data from one client, a Fortune 500 brick-and-mortar chain, for a six-month period ending in March 2018. The data covered 10 campaigns, 4,786 stores, and close to 15,000 promotional displays.
Major brands strategically timed the displays. Johnson & Johnson’s campaign ran in conjunction with the start of flu and allergy season, while Coca-Cola’s promoted new packaging for Diet Coke.
Thanks to the IoT, the researchers could track when and whether those displays made it to store floors at the planned times. They found that:
“One major issue is poor execution, leading to missed sales opportunities,” says Stamatopoulos.
Poor execution deprived brands of substantial sales, the researchers found. Displays boosted sales of targeted products 2.3% more when they were installed during the specified campaign period, rather than during a noncampaign week.
“If it’s done correctly, it can actually boost sales,” says Agarwal.
Why aren’t stores doing it correctly? By visiting stores and interviewing employees, the startup company learned that busy managers often saw the displays as a nuisance.
“From their perspective, displays are a hassle to assemble and to dismantle,” Agarwal says. “They take up space in the backroom, and they clutter the sales floor.”
Drilling deeper into the data, the researchers found correlations that supported the nuisance diagnosis.
Agarwal says the most obvious solution to the problem is to invest in IoT technology, as did the companies in the study. Installing sensors in every store and promotional display might be cost-prohibitive for some, but it could pay off over time, as brands recouped lost sales.
Absent technology, another solution would be to offer financial incentives to store managers, to encourage them to install displays correctly.
Ultimately, it’s up to retailers to decide what’s best for them.
“This study is showing you the value of promotional displays,” he says. “The next step would be to do a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether you should implement the technology or not.”
More information: Jacob Z. Zeng et al, Promotional Inventory Displays: An Empirical Analysis Using IoT Data, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (2024). DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.0291
Provided by University of Texas at Austin
Explore further
Facebook
Twitter
Email
Feedback to editors
Jul 13, 2024
0
Jul 13, 2024
1
Jul 12, 2024
0
Jul 12, 2024
0
Jul 11, 2024
1
2 hours ago
Jul 13, 2024
Jul 13, 2024
Jul 13, 2024
Jul 12, 2024
Jul 12, 2024
Jul 12, 2024
Jul 12, 2024
Jul 12, 2024
Jul 12, 2024
40 minutes ago
1 hour ago
7 hours ago
Jul 13, 2024
Jul 11, 2024
Jul 11, 2024
More from Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
May 14, 2021
Apr 29, 2024
Sep 13, 2021
Mar 24, 2022
Nov 27, 2017
May 18, 2020
Jul 10, 2024
Jul 10, 2024
Jul 10, 2024
Jul 8, 2024
Jul 3, 2024
Jul 2, 2024
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient’s address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.
Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we’ll never share your details to third parties.
More information Privacy policy
We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X’s mission by getting a premium account.
Medical research advances and health news
The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances
The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web

More Stories
The Shift in Peering Threatening the Internet’s Foundations
Remembering Alan Barrett: A Builder of the African Internet
From Email to Case Study: What We Learned About Connecting Refugee Communities in Just One Year