June 9, 2026

DNS Africa Resource Center

..sharing knowledge.

A root-server at the Internet’s core lost touch with its peers. We still don’t know why. – Ars Technica

Front page layout
Site theme

The lag prompted engineers to delay work that had been scheduled for this week on the name servers that handle lookups for domain names ending in .gov and .int. The plan had been to update the servers’ DNSSEC to use ECDSA cryptographic keys. Without the ability for the new keys to be rolled out uniformly to all root servers, those plans had to be scrubbed.
“We are fully aware and monitoring the situation around the C-root servers and will not proceed with the ongoing DNSSEC algorithm roll until it has stabilized,” Christian Elmerot, a Cloudflare engineer in charge of the .gov DNSSEC transition, announced Wednesday. Engineers planning the transition to the .int server made the same call, but only after some people worried the work would proceed despite the problem.
In an interview, Elmerot said the real-world effects of the update problems were minimal, but over time, the impact would have grown. He explained:
As changes accumulate in the root zone, the difference between the versions begin to matter more. Typical changes in the root zone are changing delegations (NS records), rotating DS records for DNSSEC updates and with all this comes updates to DNSSEC signatures. If the differences remain, then the outdated root server will see the DNSSEC signatures expire and that will begin to have more marked consequences. Using more than one root server lowers the chance that a resolver uses the lagging root server.
The misperforming c-root coincided with another glitch that prevented many people from reaching the c-root website, which is also maintained by Cogent. Many assumed that the cause for both problems was the same. It later turned out that the site problems were the result of Cogent transferring the IP address used to host the site to Orange Ivory Coast, an African subsidiary of French telecom Orange.
The mixup prompted Bortzmeyer to joke, “Reported to Cogent (ticket HD303751898) but they do not seem to understand that they manage a root name server.”
The errors come as Cogent has in recent months terminated relationships with several carriers to exchange each other’s traffic under an arrangement known as peering. The most recent termination occurred last Friday, when Cogent partially ”depeered” Indian carrier Tata Communications, a move that made many Tata-hosted sites in the Asia Pacific region unreachable to Cogent customers.
Late Wednesday, Cogent published the following statement, indicating it wasn’t aware of the glitch until Tuesday, and it took another 25 hours to fix it:
On May 21 at 15:30 UTC the c-root team at Cogent Communications was informed that the root zone as served by c-root had ceased to track changes from the root zone publication server after May 18. Analysis showed this to have been caused by an unrelated routing policy change whose side effect was to silence the relevant monitoring systems. No production DNS queries went unanswered by c-root as a result of this outage, and the only impact was on root zone freshness. Root zone freshness as served by c-root was fully restored on May 22 at 16:00 UTC.
Initially, some people speculated that the depeering of Tata Communications, the c-root site outage, and the update errors to the c-root itself were all connected somehow. Given the vagueness of the statement, the relation of those events still isn’t entirely clear.
Join the Ars Orbital Transmission mailing list to get weekly updates delivered to your inbox.
CNMN Collection
WIRED Media Group
© 2024 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement (updated 1/1/20) and Privacy Policy and Ars Technica Addendum. Ars may earn compensation on sales from links on this site. Read our affiliate link policy.
Your California Privacy Rights | Do Not Sell My Personal Information
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast.
Ad Choices

source

About The Author