Best practices for generative AI in academic research – Inside Higher Ed

Guidance from Cornell University identifies how artificial intelligence tools should be applied to research, with guidance on navigating the shortcomings of generative AI.
By  Ashley Mowreader
You have /5 articles left.
Sign up for a free account or log in.
As researchers grapple with how to engage with generative artificial intelligence, Cornell University researchers and faculty offer insights.
sanjeri/E+/Getty Images
A recent report from a Cornell University task force on AI identifies a framework and perspectives on how generative AI can aid or influence academic research.
The report, “Generative AI in Academic Research: Perspectives and Cultural Norms,” was published Dec. 15 and highlights best practices in the current landscape, how university policies impact the Cornell community and considerations for other faculty members or researchers navigating the new tech tools.
The background: The university developed the Cornell AI Initiative in 2021 to lead institutionwide collaboration around AI development and application. The group published a report in early fall 2023 identifying policies for generative AI in higher education and pedagogy for faculty members.
This most recent report was authored by a task force of researchers, faculty members and staff and led by Krystyn Van Vliet, vice president for research and innovation.
Providing guidance on generative AI can be a challenge given the evolving nature of the tool, and this report is not the be-all and end-all, but it’s the first step in a larger conversation, Van Vliet says. The authors intend to revisit its guidance annually but are offering the report now to the Cornell audience and the larger higher education space to kick-start conversations around research and AI tools.
Report’s purpose: The December report identifies four phases of research stages and how generative AI can be applied to each phase, the perspectives and cultural norms around generative AI, and discussion questions for stakeholders.
There are two different groups of researchers who are engaging with generative AI: those developing tools based on AI in creating models and algorithms, and those using or adapting those tools, Van Vliet says. “We wanted to speak to both of those communities’ research practices.”
Within the four stages of research practice—conception and execution, dissemination, translation, and funding/funding agreement compliance—the report lists specific situations generative AI should or should not be applied.
“In all of these research stages, we consider GenAI to be a useful research tool that can and should be explored and used to great scholarly advantage,” the report says. “As with all tools, the user is responsible for understanding how to use such tools wisely.”
Key concerns: Some highlighted concerns that carry across research disciplines include:
The report encourages researchers to refer to existing policies and practices given by their research communities and institutions to guide their best practices. Cornell, for example, has a University Privacy Statement and policy on research data retention, which apply to data shared with generative AI models.
For faculty members: While today’s researchers are grappling with how to engage with generative AI tools, faculty members and instructors are engaging future researchers in the classroom.
“I think it will become part of the toolbox of the next generation of researchers,” Van Vliet says.
Cornell’s report offers an appendix of questions for faculty to engage with students about generative AI use and their perspectives. Each question comes with a sample response as well. Just as technology advances research, it also shifts how researchers engage in their work, making it critical for higher education professionals to lead and engage in thoughtful discussions about tools and research processes, Van Vliet says.
“Those are discussion starters that researchers, including the leaders of research teams, you can think about this for yourself, you can discuss with your team in meetings, you can discuss them with your department leadership,” Van Vliet says. “This is a great place to start and then to sharpen your own thinking and to learn more as well as in your community.”
Some questions include:
Do you have an academic success tip that might help others encourage student success? Tell us about it.
Universities should work with right-leaning critics who want to strengthen academia’s distinctive culture, Jenna Silb
Fewer people are earning degrees for the second year in a row, but certificates are having a moment, according to a n
The University of California, Irvine, created a certificate program to teach digital literacy skills to campus commun
Student success advocates at the University of Kentucky have built a culture of evidence through weekly data meetings
Subscribe for free to Inside Higher Ed’s newsletters, featuring the latest news, opinion and great new careers in higher education — delivered to your inbox.
View Newsletters
Copyright © 2024 Inside Higher Ed All rights reserved. | Website designed by nclud
4/5 Articles remaining
this month.

source

About The Author

admin

See author's posts