‘Potential’ to share more research on ‘underused’ YouTube – Times Higher Education

Resources for
academics and university staff
Everything you need for each step
of your study abroad journey
Universities should formally recognise academics’ work building successful YouTube channels to allow for the significant potential growth of scientific research on the platform, a new paper has urged.
Researchers say the video site’s distinct user base and content style was understudied as an area for engaging with scholarly output – even within the sphere of altmetrics data, which primarily focuses on platforms such as X.
“Understanding YouTube’s unique role in the altmetrics landscape could offer deeper insights into the multi-dimensional nature of how research is communicated and perceived in the digital age,” says a paper published in Scientometrics.
The paper analysed 11,332 YouTube channels that posted more than 35,000 unique videos referencing research publications in their video descriptions.
It found that a quarter of the channels focus on science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Other regular topics included health, fitness and well-being, and popular science.
Channels categorised as opinions and commentary were those using research papers to promote unscientific beliefs, or attempt to counteract fake beliefs, such as the flat Earth theory.
Co-author Olga Zagovora, a researcher at the University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, told Times Higher Education that research publications were gradually becoming more visible on YouTube, with its interactive nature ideal for engaging viewers in discussions.
“YouTube indeed offers significant potential for the growth of scientific dissemination,” said Dr Zagovora.
“The platform allows for a wide reach, potentially engaging a global audience far beyond traditional academic boundaries.”
Videos in the popular science section were found to be the most popular, but the study found that these were predominantly run by large media groups or professional YouTube teams, not academics.
And though academics, research institutions and publishers made up a combined 44 per cent of the paper’s sample of channels, those behind the most popular videos were predominantly by professional YouTubers, as well as commercial media.
The paper says, despite being one of the most visited platforms on the internet, YouTube is underused by academics for disseminating research and the disparity in popularity can be explained by the substantial resources required for effective promotion.
In addition, Dr Zagovora said that traditional metrics for academic success and career progression at most institutions ignore activities such creating and maintaining a YouTube channel.
“While these activities enhance public engagement and education, they do not typically count towards academic promotions or grant evaluations, which can disincentivise academics from investing time in such platforms,” she said.
“Unless such impacts are formally recognised and rewarded within academic structures, individual researchers may find little institutional support for these efforts.”
She also said that building a significant online following can also lead to opportunities outside the traditional academic realm, including book deals, public speaking engagements or consulting opportunities.
patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com
Why register?
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login
Institution once attended by MrBeast, YouTube’s highest-paid content creator, among those seeking to serve growing industry
A video by a professor for only their class is akin to the single-copy, handwritten book disseminated to just one room of people, says David Kellermann
Student vloggers are the perfect ‘weapon to target university applicants’, increasingly regarded as more powerful than other marketing methods
James Pickering, named 2014’s most innovative teacher at the Times Higher Education Awards, discusses making content accessible. Plus the latest higher education appointments
Labour’s wholehearted support for Aria chair Matt Clifford’s artificial intelligence blueprint promises more funding for scholarships and fellowships
Institution-wide policies must affirm the necessity of engaging critically with AI tools in ways that foster human agency, writes Joseph Moxley
Research found that 74 per cent of academics had experienced online harms as a result of sharing research publicly
Technology can offer a very useful helping hand, but there are an array of pitfalls that need careful handling, says John Miles
Subscribe to Times Higher Education
As the voice of global higher education, THE is an invaluable daily resource. Subscribe today to receive unlimited news and analyses, commentary from the sharpest minds in international academia, our influential university rankings analysis and the latest insights from our World Summit series.

source

About The Author

admin

See author's posts