One in three researchers now using ChatGPT at work: survey – Times Higher Education

Resources for
academics and university staff
Everything you need for each step
of your study abroad journey
Nearly one in three researchers have started using ChatGPT for work purposes, according to a major survey.
In a survey of more than 2,200 researchers globally, conducted by academic publisher Elsevier, 31 per cent say that they have used the generative artificial intelligence tool as part of their work.
In the Elsevier report, 41 per cent of researchers questioned say that they feel positively about the development of AI tools including generative AI, while 48 per cent say they have mixed feelings, and 10 per cent say they are unsure. Only 1 per cent say that they feel negatively about AI.
Seventy-four per cent of researchers think that AI will have a “transformative” or “significant” impact on their work in the near future.
And the vast majority of researchers felt that AI could have at least some benefits across teaching, research and academic publishing.
However, scholars acknowledge that AI tools have disadvantages. When asked to name the top three disadvantages, AI’s inability to replace human creativity, judgement and empathy is cited by 39 per cent of respondents, as is a perceived lack of regulation and governance. Thirty-two per cent express concern over a lack of accountability over the use of generative AI outputs, while 25 per cent complain of factually incorrect or nonsensical outputs.
Overall, 26 per cent of researchers say that they have “fundamental” or “significant” concerns about the ethical implications of AI, while 50 per cent say that they have some concerns.
Kieran West, Elsevier’s executive vice-president for strategy, said: “AI has the potential to transform many aspects of our lives, including research, innovation and healthcare, all vital drivers of societal progress. As it becomes more integrated into our everyday lives and continues to advance at a rapid pace, its adoption is expected to rise.
“Researchers and clinicians worldwide are telling us they have an appetite for adoption to aid their profession and work, but not at the cost of ethics, transparency and accuracy.
“They have indicated that high-quality, verified information, responsible development and transparency are paramount to building trust in AI tools, and alleviating concerns over misinformation and inaccuracy. This report suggests some steps that need to be taken to build confidence and usage in the AI tools of today and tomorrow.”
The Elsevier survey comes after a separate survey of more than 2,300 researchers, conducted by Oxford University Press, found that 76 per cent use some form of AI tool in their research, with machine translations and chatbots cited as the most popular tools, followed by AI-powered search engines or research tools. AI is most used for discovering, editing and summarising existing research, the OUP report found.
chris.havergal@timeshighereducation.com
Why register?
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login
Poll finds most researchers are using AI but only a tiny number trust technology companies on data privacy
Global survey of peer reviewers reveals deep distrust towards ChatGPT, with some calling for a complete ban on its use in research and academia
Nobel-winning scientists are now using large language models, but experts say their impact on research is only just starting
The AI chatbot may soon kill the undergraduate essay, but its transformation of research could be equally seismic. Jack Grove examines how ChatGPT is already disrupting scholarly practices and where the technology may eventually take researchers – for good or ill
The pioneering French physicist explains why she still lectures and how she kept her Nobel prize news under wraps at the lectern
Former city MP suggests Nuclear AMRC should be removed from university control as job cuts loom
UCLA lecturer says ban necessary due to fears that those discussing contentious issues may face repercussions
Without increased support, many RAs may choose to leave for other opportunities that provide more job security and benefits, says Bre-Anne Fifield
Subscribe to Times Higher Education
As the voice of global higher education, THE is an invaluable daily resource. Subscribe today to receive unlimited news and analyses, commentary from the sharpest minds in international academia, our influential university rankings analysis and the latest insights from our World Summit series.

source

About The Author

admin

See author's posts