‘Jealousy’ blocks interdisciplinary research – Times Higher Education

Resources for
academics and university staff
Everything you need for each step
of your study abroad journey
Barriers to building multidisciplinary research in universities can include “jealous” academics and a lack of incentives or community, the Times Higher Education World Academic Summit has heard.
The summit, hosted by the University of Sydney, is on the theme of “collaborating for greatness in a multidisciplinary world”.
While there is often talk about research that works across disciplines being the solution to many of the world’s biggest challenges, a session on “building multidisciplinary research from the ground up” heard there are plenty of barriers within universities.
Shearer West, the University of Nottingham vice-chancellor, related her university’s experience of creating six “beacons of excellence”, in global challenges including ensuring sustainable food supplies, ending slavery and developing greener transport systems.
“We were able to bring on early career [researchers] into new multidisciplinary spaces, we cemented a number of our industrial partnerships and we had spin-outs and various other outcomes we might not have had otherwise,” Professor West told the event.
There were other “concrete outcomes”, such as the precision imaging beacon leading on to Nottingham winning £29 million of funding to create the UK’s most powerful Magnetic Resonance Imaging scanner, “on the basis of having this new capability”.
“That was all great. What didn’t work…there was a lack of fit [in] these beacons with the structures, governance and financial arrangements for a university,” Professor West continued.
Another problem was “internal politics”, she added. “There were some very jealous people in the university who felt like this investment was ‘coming to them, not to us’. And that created some really bad feeling, unfortunately.”
Professor West summed up on multidisciplinary research: “It’s risky; you have to hold your nerve for outcomes. It’s worth doing; but you also have to expect and tolerate failure.”
Megan Kenna, founding executive director of Schmidt Science Fellows, which identifies outstanding PhD graduates and provides them with postdoctoral fellowships to mount a “significant disciplinary pivot from their PhD topic”, told the event: “We heard from a lot of our fellows there really were a lot of barriers to doing this kind of problem-focused interdisciplinary science when they went back into academia and other areas.”
Schmidt Science Fellows and THE recently announced they would be partnering with the aim of developing a new ranking measuring universities’ contribution to interdisciplinary science.
One barrier the organisation’s fellows highlighted was “a lack of high-risk, high-reward funding for interdisciplinary science”, said Dr Kenna.
Another problem raised, she added, was a “lack of community – actually there’s something really important about having other people who are approaching things in similar ways to you and reading the same journals and having conversations with them”.
That showed “building a community of people who are trying to do science differently is a really important factor”, she continued.
And Dr Kenna also said fellows found “the incentive structure [in universities] really disincentivised interdisciplinarity – that in fact if you were first author on papers, or publishing in the journals you were expected to publish in…you were more likely to be promoted”.
Professor West suggested the consensus on the panel was that “incentives rather than shot-gun marriages is the [right] top-down tactic”.
john.morgan@timeshighereducation.com
Why register?
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login
Politicians, funders and university leaders all intone the mantra of interdisciplinarity. But what does the concept really mean? Will it really yield the insights it promises? And how best can it be fostered? Ellie Bothwell reports
Study of grant funding in Australia suggests that collaboration across STEM and non-STEM divide is not the norm
Multidisciplinary mindset requires more diverse reward structures, says Sydney v-c
Universities need to adapt career paths to accommodate scientists who tap into different fields, says research
‘Transparent metrics’ on how Imperial examines the green credentials of energy firms will spark ‘hard conversations’ about engaging with polluting sectors, says vice-provost
UK research funding urgently needs to become less onerous and less unfair if we don’t want applicants to simply give up, says Melvyn Smith
With new project to study advanced computing, NSF doesn’t ask major online companies to share secrets but hopes they eventually will
As Harvard University seeks a new leader following the short-lived presidency of Claudine Gay, the institution’s long-time president Derek Bok reflects on the need for elite US universities to react to the political maelstrom by abandoning questionable practices and improving the quality of their education
Subscribe
If you like what you’re reading online, why not take advantage of our subscription and get unlimited access to all of Times Higher Education‘s content?
You’ll get full access to our website, print and digital editions.

source

About The Author

admin

See author's posts