New literature review on 'crisis of confidence' due to lack of reproducibility in academic research – Phys.org

Click here to sign in with or
Forget Password?
Learn more
share this!
2
Twit
Share
Email
February 1, 2024
This article has been reviewed according to Science X’s editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content’s credibility:
fact-checked
trusted source
proofread
by Leila Ugincius, Virginia Commonwealth University
In light of recent cases of plagiarism and academic fraud at institutions across the country, a Virginia Commonwealth University professor’s new study provides a timely review of the current state of research findings in academia, especially fields related to psychology and management.
“If a scientific discipline’s research is deemed untrustworthy, it can have dire consequences, including the withdraw[al] of funding for future research,” Sven Kepes, professor of management in the VCU Business School, writes in the psychology journal Acta Psychologica.
In the article, “The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology: The current state of affairs and a path forward,” Kepes and co-authors Sheila K. Keener of Old Dominion University, a former VCU Business Ph.D. student, and Ann-Kathrin Torka of TU Dortmund University review literature related to the “crisis of confidence” stemming from the lack of reproducibility and replicability of many academic research findings in the field of industrial/organizational psychology.
Ironically, they note, the purpose of industrial/organizational psychology is to build and organize trustworthy knowledge about people-related phenomena in the workplace. Yet the prevalence of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices make it less likely that research findings will be trustworthy.
“To make evidence-based decisions, people need to understand how to properly evaluate scientific research,” Kepes and his colleagues write. “To do so, they need to know about potential problems in the field, including scientific misconduct.”
The study highlights internal factors, such as personal characteristics, that can raise an individual’s probability to engage in questionable behaviors. But it also points to external factors, such as insufficient training, a reward system that incentivizes research quantity, journals preferring statistically significant results, and the opportunity to engage in behaviors that increase the likelihood of publishing as many studies as possible.
“It is likely not possible to address every potential reason why researchers may engage in misconduct and questionable research practices and make errors,” the paper reads. “However, there are several changes that we can make, which should help reduce the frequency and impact of misconduct, questionable research practices and errors.”
Those changes include:
More information: Sheila K. Keener et al, The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology: The current state of affairs and a path forward, Acta Psychologica (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104005
Provided by Virginia Commonwealth University
Explore further
Facebook
Twitter
Email
Feedback to editors
15 hours ago
0
Feb 2, 2024
0
Feb 2, 2024
0
Feb 2, 2024
0
Feb 1, 2024
0
13 hours ago
15 hours ago
Feb 2, 2024
Feb 2, 2024
Feb 2, 2024
Feb 2, 2024
Feb 2, 2024
Feb 2, 2024
Feb 2, 2024
Feb 2, 2024
9 hours ago
12 hours ago
Feb 2, 2024
Jan 31, 2024
Jan 31, 2024
Jan 31, 2024
More from Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Dec 29, 2023
Feb 10, 2023
Apr 29, 2017
Jan 29, 2024
Apr 10, 2018
Jan 10, 2024
Jan 22, 2024
Jan 18, 2024
Jan 17, 2024
Jan 17, 2024
Jan 13, 2024
Jan 12, 2024
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient’s address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.

Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we’ll never share your details to third parties.
More information Privacy policy
We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X’s mission by getting a premium account.
Medical research advances and health news
The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances
The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web

source

About The Author

admin

See author's posts