Why do women leave academia after completing a PhD? – Sciencenorway

Norske og internasjonale forskningsnyheter
Forskningsnyheter for unge
Science news from Norway in English
Science news from Norway in English
Meninger, debatt og blogger skrevet av forskere
Meninger, debatt og blogger skrevet av forskere
Forskning.nos stillingsmarked
Share your science:
The proportion of women in academia progressively decreases with advancing career stages. This phenomenon is known as the leaky pipeline. It means that women are ‘leaking out’ of the academic pipeline.

It affects all fields of research. However, the problem is particularly accentuated within Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics – the STEM disciplines.
The number of female candidates dramatically decreases from master’s to PhD, and continues declining at the postdoc/researcher level, reaching the lowest point at full professorship.
Although the number of female candidates reaching PhD-level is higher than the number of male candidates, the reduction slope for women in academia intensifies at the higher levels.
It is the opposite for men. So, we have two lines showing male and female numbers in the career path crossing each other, creating a further distance at the highest academic level, giving a scissor-shaped curve.
The numbers are different from one discipline and university to another. However, the slope remains.
Metaphorically, women are being cut away from the high end of the academic career development path. So the question is, are we losing something here?
The clear answer is: Yes.
And this is serious for several reasons:
Several factors cause this problem. There are biological factors, as well as cultural factors. Biologically, women have age limitations for fertility, which unfortunately tend to match the career development period in academia.
So, while young men aged 25-45 can focus on achieving success in their careers, especially at the PhD-level and after its completion, women must also consider maternity.
Toktam Ramezanifarkhani, associate professor in cybersecurity at Kristiania University College
Women also tend to consider themselves more successful when they manage to foster several aspects of life in this short time; starting a family, giving birth to a suitable number of kids with good age differences, and raising them, while at the same time remaining healthy, youthful and physically attractive, as well as pursuing a successful career. Society and culture tend to expect the same from a woman.
Men, on the other hand, are not to the same degree expected to expand the other aspects of life in those ages such as achieving ‘settled paternity’ while pursuing a successful career at the top stages in academia.
As a result, women often struggle to progress in their careers and are more likely to leave academia altogether at the last career development phases.

While all researchers may face well-known syndromes such as imposter syndrome and depression, female researchers struggle to succeed in various areas of life during a relatively short time slot.
If academia itself is not the direct cause by actively pushing female researchers out through exaggerated expectations of publications, supervision, teaching, etc., academia is no doubt losing them. The numbers are clear.
Biology, society, and culture combined create the leaky pipeline problem for women in academia, resulting in the scissor-shaped curve, revealing the dramatic difference between male and female careers within academia.
Historically there have been many attempts at gender equality measures within many professional areas, with no exception in academia. One example is giving women priority when hiring in cases where two applicants have equal expertise.
However, academic women must gain competence, survive in academia, and apply to reach the hiring step. Hence, rather than waiting for a hiring opportunity, academia should create incentives that fit female researchers better to prevent them from «leaking out» of academia.
Apart from broadening the hiring strategies, the rules of promotion should be changed in order to keep valuable female researchers who are eager scientists for the future.
Considering that the biological, social, and cultural expectations are different for women and men, how can we justify the rules and processes being the same?
It is crucial to address this issue not only to provide equal opportunities for women but also to promote diversity and excellence in academic research and teaching.
Let’s not lose PhD women in academia, as they are the low-hanging fruits!
References:
The ScienceNorway Researchers’ zone consists of opinions, blogs and popular science pieces written by researchers and scientists from or based in Norway.
Want to contribute? Send us an email!

Researchers see traces of dramatic volcanic eruptions in Norway.
A small group of researchers worked on the new Østmarka National Park.
“We’re not part of the cosmetics industry,” dentist Line Bjerklund Pedersen says.
For those who rent a home, expenses have remained almost stable.
ASK A RESEARCHER: Wool can be warm, soft, and comfortable, but it can also itch terribly. Why is that?
Many Norwegians succeeded in America. The houses they built are evidence of this.
The duck-billed dinosaur Zelda will be permanently displayed at the Natural History Museum in Oslo.
“It can quickly become a lot of hassle,” a food researcher believes. “It’s much easier to have a vegetarian visit than many think,” a vegetarian says.
After red Santa hats were banned in Norway during World War II, many creative Christmas cards appeared.
We have it easier today than before, one researcher believes. Christmas is still demanding and complicated, believes another.
There is a volcanic eruption on the Reykjanes Peninsula in Iceland following several earthquakes. The eruption comes after weeks of smaller tremors in the area.
Studies show that being exposed to violence and threats increases the risk of psychological problems and illness, a researcher says. In the worst case, these teachers could disappear from working life.
“We hope he will become the father of many kits,” researcher says.
Many of the emigrants were young and adventurous.
“The whitening agent is acidic, so it is not something we recommend doing too often,” researcher Aida Mulic says.
People place little dolls with anti-war messages in squares in big Russian cities. The Russian war resistance lives on, researchers say.
“Do the Israelis believe peace is what will rise from the ashes in Gaza?” researcher Dag Tuastad asks.
This flood of new studies may affect research quality, and people may lose confidence in science as a result, a group of researchers believe.
Norwegian youth have an increasing consumption of energy drinks. This concerns the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.
Poor hearing in the elderly – which can be addressed – is among the most important factors that increase the risk of developing dementia, a study shows.
A researcher has now found a method which he believes can more quickly determine how dangerous this plaque is for our heart and brain.
Sciencenorway.no brings you science news from Norway.
This is the English version of forskning.no, Norway’s independent, online newspaper on science.
Privacy policy
ScienceNorway.no follows the Norwegian Editor’s Code and the Code of Ethics of the Norwegian Press.
Editor-in-chief: Aksel Kjær Vidnes
+47 922 47 741 / aksel@forskning.no
Assistant editor: Ida Irene Bergstrøm
ida@forskning.no
Ads and market: Preben Forberg
+47 413 10 879 / preben@forskning.no
Address: Sandakerveien 24 C / D3, Oslo, Norway
/Sciencenorway.no
@Sciencenorwayno
/forskning.no

source

About The Author

admin

See author's posts