Paper written using ChatGPT demonstrates opportunities and challenges of AI in academia – Phys.org

Click here to sign in with or
Forget Password?
Learn more
share this!
191
11
Share
Email
March 23, 2023
This article has been reviewed according to Science X’s editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content’s credibility:
fact-checked
trusted source
proofread
by University of Plymouth
ChatGPT has the potential to create increasing and exciting opportunities—but also poses significant challenges—for the academic community, according to an innovative study written in large part using the software.
Launched in November 2022, ChatGPT is the latest chatbot and artificial intelligence (AI) platform touted as having the potential to revolutionize research and education.
However, as it becomes ever more advanced, the technology has also prompted concerns across the education sector about academic honesty and plagiarism.
To address some of these, the new study directly uses ChatGPT to demonstrate how sophisticated Large Language Machines (LLMs) have become but also the steps that can be taken to ensure its influence remains a positive one.
Published in the journal Innovations in Education and Teaching International, the research was conceived by academics from Plymouth Marjon University and the University of Plymouth.
For the majority of the paper, they used a series of prompts and questions to encourage ChatGPT to produce content in an academic style. These included:
Once the text was generated, they copied and pasted the output into the manuscript, ordered it broadly following the structure suggested by ChatGPT, and then inserted genuine references throughout.
This process was only revealed to readers in the paper’s Discussion section, which was written directly by the researchers without the software’s input.
In that section, the study’s authors highlight that the text produced by ChatGPT—while much more sophisticated than previous innovations in this area—can be relatively formulaic, and that a number of existing AI-detection tools would pick up on that.
However, they say their findings should serve as a wake-up call to university staff to think very carefully about the design of their assessments and ways to ensure that academic dishonesty is clearly explained to students and minimized.
Professor Debby Cotton, Director of Academic Practice and Professor of Higher Education at Plymouth Marjon University, is the study’s lead author. She said, “This latest AI development obviously brings huge challenges for universities, not least in testing student knowledge and teaching writing skills—but looking positively it is an opportunity for us to rethink what we want students to learn and why. I’d like to think that AI would enable us to automate some of the more administrative tasks academics do, allowing more time to be spent working with students”
Corresponding author Dr. Peter Cotton, Associate Professor in Ecology at the University of Plymouth, added, “Banning ChatGPT, as was done within New York schools, can only be a short-term solution while we think how to address the issues. AI is already widely accessible to students outside their institutions, and companies like Microsoft and Google are rapidly incorporating it into search engines and Office suites. The chat (sic) is already out of the bag, and the challenge for universities will be to adapt to a paradigm where the use of AI is the expected norm.”
Dr. Reuben Shipway, Lecturer in Marine Biology at the University of Plymouth, said, “With any new revolutionary technology—and this is a revolutionary technology—there will be winners and losers. The losers will be those that fail to adapt to a rapidly changing landscape. The winners will take a pragmatic approach and leverage this technology to their advantage.”
More information: Debby R. E. Cotton et al, Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT, Innovations in Education and Teaching International (2023). DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Provided by University of Plymouth
Explore further
Facebook
Twitter
Email
Feedback to editors
11 hours ago
0
13 hours ago
0
14 hours ago
0
Dec 20, 2023
0
Dec 20, 2023
0
6 hours ago
7 hours ago
7 hours ago
7 hours ago
7 hours ago
8 hours ago
9 hours ago
9 hours ago
9 hours ago
10 hours ago
6 hours ago
10 hours ago
Dec 19, 2023
Dec 16, 2023
Dec 11, 2023
Dec 11, 2023
More from STEM Educators and Teaching
Jan 27, 2023
Mar 13, 2023
Feb 1, 2023
Feb 16, 2023
Feb 2, 2023
Jan 30, 2023
Dec 11, 2023
Dec 7, 2023
Nov 29, 2023
Nov 27, 2023
Nov 27, 2023
Nov 21, 2023
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient’s address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.

Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we’ll never share your details to third parties.
More information Privacy policy
We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X’s mission by getting a premium account.
Medical research advances and health news
The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances
The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web

source

About The Author

admin

See author's posts