Publications and conferences – Clarivate

Clarivate is a global leader in trusted and transformative intelligence.
Learn more about our mission and what we do
Executive Leadership
Our global leadership is committed to accelerating the pace of innovation.
Learn more about our leaders
Sustainability
Sustainability is at the heart of everything we do.
Learn more about our approach
Featured articles
Sustainability – The foundation of everything we do

At Clarivate, we have created an interconnected, shared purpose that guides every decision we make in order to improve environmental, social, and governance issues worldwide.
How Clarivate uses Artificial Intelligence you can trust to transform your world

Our dedicated Data Science team have implemented AI across our portfolio to enhance our tools and solutions for decades, and they are forward thinking in their approach to utilizing new technology as it emerges.
News and insights from Clarivate.
Read the latest news
Featured news
Clarivate Expands Partnership with VeriSIM Life to Accelerate and De-risk Research and Drug Development

Clarivate announced the launch of VeriSIM Life Translational Index™ on Cortellis Drug Discovery Intelligence by Clarivate. The integrated workflow provides customers with a diverse array of predictive compound safety and efficacy insights.
Clarivate and the Chinese Academy of Sciences Release Annual Report to Identify 128 Research Fronts

Clarivate and the Chinese Academy of Sciences released their “Research Fronts 2023” annual joint report which identified a total of 128 Research Fronts including 110 “hot” and 18 “emerging” Fronts.
We believe that the best results come from working together in respectful partnership with our colleagues and customers.
See how we keep our customers first
Featured news
Clarivate Reveals World’s Influential Researchers in Highly Cited Researchers 2023 List

Clarivate revealed its 2023 list of Highly Cited Researchers™ – influential researchers at universities, research institutes and commercial organizations around the world who have demonstrated significant and broad influence in their fields of research.
Clarivate Expands Partnership with VeriSIM Life to Accelerate and De-risk Research and Drug Development

Clarivate announced the launch of VeriSIM Life Translational Index™ on Cortellis Drug Discovery Intelligence by Clarivate. The integrated workflow provides customers with a diverse array of predictive compound safety and efficacy insights.
Trusted partner to innovators everywhere.
Learn more about how we help our customers
Featured stories
Case study: Understanding competitive dynamics at IQGEN-X

India-based IQGEN-X turned to Cortellis Generics Intelligence to aid in its strategic planning and improve ROI.
Enabling research excellence in the health sciences

Acibadem University, Türkiye uses citation analytics to elevate its performance and establish itself as an expert in health sciences globally
Whether you’re looking for product support, learning and training or have billing or invoice inquiries, we can help.
Get help
Academia & Government
Drive research excellence and student success. Learn more
Deliver innovative, impactful research outcomes by equipping your institution with trustworthy, curated data, flexible solutions, and unbiased expertise. Learn more.
Research discovery and referencing
Research funding and analytics
Publisher Solutions
Featured products
Journal Citation Reports

Make confident decisions with transparent, publisher-neutral journal data.
Web of Science Core Collection

A trusted citation index for locating research across a curated, multidisciplinary set of journals, books, & conferences
Pivot-RP

Increase funding success rates using an expert-curated source of global funding opportunities with powerful workflow, intelligence and discovery tools.
Content solutions delivered in context to help researchers, faculty and students achieve success in research and learning. Learn more.
Menu Item
Featured products
ProQuest One Academic

Meet the needs of students and faculty with a collection of essential multiformat content, all in one place.
ProQuest Historical Newspapers

Access sought-after primary sources with the definitive digitized newspaper archive with over 50 million pages.
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global

Uncover new ideas and research innovations in the world’s most comprehensive curated collection of multidisciplinary dissertations and theses.
Unparalleled content aggregation and curation and marketplaces for content discovery, acquisition and insights. Learn more.
Menu Item
Featured products
Academic Complete

This affordable subscription comes with a growing selection of 234,000+ titles that support curricula, graduation rate trends and emerging courses
Ebooks Offers

Make the most of your library collection budget and explore offers from key academic publishers and university presses
Curated Topics

Expertly selected title lists, created by and for librarians, that feature the latest and most-requested front-list electronic and print books
Revolutionizing library technology through connection, collaboration, and innovation. Learn more.
Public Libraries
Academic Libraries
Featured products
Alma

Manage print, electronic, and digital materials in a single interface using the leading unified library services platform.
Primo

Maximize the exposure of your library collections, and provide students and researchers with fast access to scholarly materials.
Achieve important national outcomes with the world’s most trusted data and intelligence. Learn more.
Menu Item
Featured products
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global

Uncover new ideas and research innovations in the world’s most comprehensive curated collection of multidisciplinary dissertations and theses.
Pivot-RP

Increase funding success rates using an expert-curated source of global funding opportunities with powerful workflow, intelligence and discovery tools.
Life Sciences & Healthcare
Advance innovation and accelerate patient outcomes. Learn more
Gain patient insights today for a healthier tomorrow. Learn more.
Areas of expertise
Featured products
Clarivate Patient Data Intelligence

Self-service platform that provides instantaneous insight into patient care, dispensing, and prescribing trends.
Healthbase

The industry’s most accurate and intelligent affiliations platform.
Integrated Patient Journey

Drive better outcomes with multi-layered insights and analytics.
Plan innovative solutions and drive portfolio value. Learn more.
Market Assessment
Competitive Intelligence
Partner Identification and Deal-making
Featured resources
Companies to Watch 2023

Seven promising early-stage companies working on AI and ML applications for drug discovery and development
Webinar: Deal making in uncertain times

Watch our webinar exploring the scientific, political and financial headwinds impacting biopharma ambitions.
Oncology Drugs to Watch 2023

This report explores treatment breakthroughs highlighted at ASCO 2023.
Optimize drug discovery, successfully translate drugs from lab to clinic, and ensure regulatory approval driven by transformative intelligence across the R&D life cycle. Learn more
Discovery & Development
Regulatory & Compliance
Pharmacovigilance & Drug Safety
Featured resources
Optimizing clinical trials using real-world data

This report examines how drug developers are using real-world data to shape, supplement, and accelerate their clinical trials.
Drugs to Watch 2024

From CRISPR to bispecifics, cancer to COPD, new drugs on the cusp
Strategically launch and position your product in the market for maximum patient benefit. Learn more
Products & Services
Featured products
Fingertip Formulary™ Suite

Maximize market access opportunities with formulary data and interactive tools to track your brands versus competitors.
Patient Connect

Enabling life science companies to identify and support patients at the point of care and point of dispensing.
Real-World Data

Dive deep into the provider, patient, payer relationships to understand the complexity of care and treatment and get granular information on the patient healthcare experience, utilization patterns and direct cost expenditures.
Solutions that transform complex market, API, and regulatory data into actionable insights, driving efficient supply chain management and strategic manufacturing decision-making. Learn more
Featured products
Cortellis CMC Intelligence

Simplify access to regional governance and reduce research time with a single source of global chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC) requirements.
Cortellis Generics Intelligence

Make timely and data-driven business decisions in the biopharma generics and biosimilars markets with a single source of market performance, patent and manufacturing data.
Improving patient lives by helping clients develop and bring new treatments and devices to market. Learn more.
Areas of expertise
Featured products
Cortellis Drug Discovery Intelligence

Accelerate development with complete preclinical drug intelligence.
Real-World Data

Dive deep into the provider, patient, payer relationships to understand the complexity of care and treatment and get granular information on the patient healthcare experience, utilization patterns and direct cost expenditures.
ClaRITA – Clarivate Regulatory Intelligence Tracking App

Provide your pharmacovigilance, safety, clinical, and technical operations teams the information they need to monitor changing legislation and regulations.
Make your commercialization planning easier and more effective with medtech innovation. Learn more.
Products & Services
Featured products
Medtech360

Make informed, strategic decisions and respond to an evolving market through medtech insights.
Medical Supply Distribution

Comprehensive medical supply market share intelligence and actionable insights to track real-time trends
Procedure Finder

Understand where patients are receiving procedures to improve device marketing strategy and patient experience.
Plan your portfolio and get affordable treatments to patients. Learn more.
Menu Item
Featured products
Cortellis Generics Intelligence

Make timely and data-driven business decisions in the biopharma generics and biosimilars markets with a single source of market performance, patent and manufacturing data.
Cortellis Competitive Intelligence

Monitor the competitive landscape, validate investments and strategically prioritize your portfolio so you can focus on maximizing ROI and improving patient outcomes.
Cortellis Drug Discovery Intelligence

Accelerate development with complete preclinical drug intelligence.
Intellectual Property
Transform the way you create, manage and protect intellectual property. Learn more
Software that simplifies the process of managing intellectual property assets. Learn more
For Corporates
For Law Firms
Productivity Solutions
Featured products
IPfolio

Leading IP management software for corporations.
FoundationIP

Leading IP management software for law firms.
IP Diagnostic Consulting

Not sure which IPMS is right for you? IP Diagnostic Consulting can help.
Expert administrative support to optimize patent workflows. Learn more.
Patent Maintenance
Patent Administrative Services
Featured products
Docketing

Get reliable, world-class support on your prosecution correspondence.
Unitary Patent Support

Expert services to help you navigate the European Unitary Patent.
Patent data, software and expert research for insights you can trust. Learn more.
Patent Search & Watch
Patent Analytics
Patent Data Feeds & APIs
Featured products
Derwent Innovation

Trusted patent search software for high confidence decisions.
Innography

Patent intelligence software that delivers IP answers for business results.
Patent Search Services

Expert patent research for more confident patentability, FTO and in(validity) decisions.
Trademark solutions to build, protect and expand strong brands. Learn more.
Trademark Search
Trademark Watch
Trademark Managed Services
Trademark Data & APIs
Featured products
Clarivate Brand Landscape Analyzer

AI-enhanced research tool for assessing legal and commercial risk for new brands
Trademark Analytics

Delivers custom trademark analytics in a curated, interactive and highly readable format.
Darts-ip

IP intelligence for comprehensive insights into the litigation landscape of any IP asset
Global IP case law that informs confident IP decisions. Learn more.
Litigation & Opposition Intelligence
Litigation Research Services
Litigation Data & APIs
Featured products
Darts-ip Patent Case Law Data

The leading source of global patent case data, litigation trends and insights.
Darts-ip Trademark Case Law Data

The largest and only global IP case law database dedicated to trademark cases.
Case Law Search Services

Resources
Keep up with the latest news, insights and research from Clarivate. Read our blog
Featured articles
Change on the horizon: The evolving IP legal profession

By the year 2030, it is likely the legal space will look and operate differently to today, reshaping the way IP professionals work. What could this mean for the future of the IP legal profession?
Best practices for AI and ML use across the drug discovery and development lifecycle

The speed of drug discovery and development are being transformed by AI and machine learning applications. AI and life science companies need to conduct due diligence to ensure optimal results and avoid the pitfalls of AI capabilities.
Researchers of Nobel class: Citation Laureates 2023

The Citation Laureates™ 2023 list has been announced, recognizing a select group of influential, highly cited researchers whose contributions are on par with Nobel Prize recipients.
Novel solutions derived from our unique capabilities and those of our carefully selected partners. Learn more
Featured apps
IP-GeoScape®

From our solution partner, Accencio® – a visual landscape of the molecular IP space that reveals the multi-dimensional relationship between molecules within a target area of interest.
ClaRITA – Clarivate Regulatory Intelligence Tracking App

Provide your pharmacovigilance, safety, clinical, and technical operations teams the information they need to monitor changing legislation and regulations.
Partners
Partner with us and help accelerate innovation.
Menu Item
World-changing research should be seen, shared and celebrated. Learn more
Featured programs
Highly Cited Researchers

Researchers who have demonstrated significant and broad influence reflected in their publication of multiple highly cited papers over the last decade.
Citation Laureates

Researchers whose work is deemed to be of Nobel stature, as attested by markedly high citation tallies recorded in the Web of Science.
Eugene Garfield Award

This award honors Eugene Garfield’s legacy and recognizes early career researchers in scientometrics developing innovative techniques in citation analysis.
Webinars
Live and on-demand webinars from our experts.
Menu Item
Featured webinars
Let’s get real about data and AI

How real world data, real world evidence and AI/machine learning are poised to transform biopharma innovation and delivery of care.
Building a stronger patent portfolio: Strategies for data-driven patent portfolio management

Clarivate experts share key strategies from working with some of the world’s most innovative companies on how patent intelligence can be applied to help your legal team make the right decisions for managing patent portfolios.
Reports & Case Studies
The latest research, insights and customer case studies from Clarivate.
Menu Item
Featured reports
China’s research landscape

This new report from ISI charts the exceptional research trajectory that China has followed over the last 40 years.
Enabling a pharmaceutical company to enter new markets with confidence

See how the Clarivate patent search team performed a freedom to operate (FTO) search to help a pharma company enter new markets.
The Clarivate podcast series enables us to address issues in key business areas in new and interesting ways. Listen to our podcasts
Featured podcasts
From lab to life: The transformative power of synthetic biology

Rapid advancements in technology and science are shaping a new era, with AI and synthetic biology, or “syn-bio,” at the forefront. Jim Collins, professor at MIT and a widely recognized trailblazer in syn-bio, helps listeners navigate through its exciting but complex landscape.
Artificial Intelligence: Building bridges between science and policy

Leveraging AI tools for the greater good is the passion that drives Jaron Porciello, guest speaker in the latest episode of our “Ideas to Innovation Season 2″ podcast.
About us
Newsroom
Voice of Customer
Customer Stories
Support
Academia & Government
Drive research excellence and student success. Learn more
Scientific & Academic Research
Content Solutions
Books & Marketplaces
Library Software
Solutions for Government
Life Sciences & Healthcare
Advance innovation and accelerate patient outcomes. Learn more
Real-World Data
Portfolio Strategy & Business Development
Research & Development
Commercialization
Manufacturing
Consulting Services
MedTech
Generics
Intellectual Property
Transform the way you create, manage and protect intellectual property. Learn more
IP Management Software
Patent Services
Patent Intelligence
Brand IP Solutions
Litigation Intelligence
Resources
Blog
Clarivate Innovation Exchange
Partners
Researcher Recognition
Webinars
Reports & Case Studies
Podcasts
The Clarivate podcast series enables us to address issues in key business areas in new and interesting ways.
Gali Halevi
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate, United States
Evidence shows that women in academia are more likely to publish sole-authored papers than men and our findings add the additional insight that this occurs predominantly early in a woman’s career. There are several possible explanations. Earlier in their careers, women often seek tenure, and sole-authored publications are very important for promotion. Moreover, younger women may also have young children: family obligations can impede collaboration or travel. Women have been shown to have smaller networks than male counterparts, and this may reduce possible partnership opportunities. Further, collaboration can result in second or third authorship, which would reduce the impact of women’s contribution; women may be unwilling to receive less credit. Other reasons may be discrimination and bias, but these are less likely than the reasons suggested above.
More information
Ann Beynon
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate, United States
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are an increasingly important way to measure progress toward global challenges. We analyze SDG research based on Web of Science Core Collection data.  The publication data in Web of Science is mapped to the UN SDGs, enabling a range of analyses.  This presentation covers overall trends in SDG research, including breakdowns by publisher and open access status.  We also explore how the research mapped to SDGs aligns with our traditional journal categories.
More information
Ann Beynon, Gali Halevi
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate, United States
The Open Science movement continues to grow across the globe with support from the European Commission (EC), the OECD (OECD) , the United States National Academies (National Academies of Sciences, 2018), amongst others. The Center for Open Science (COS), a non-profit organization, was founded in 2013 to “increase the openness, integrity, and reproducibility of scientific research” (CoS). In 2015, CoS, with several universities, funders, and publishers, published the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines, eight standards scholarly journals can implement to further openness and transparency (Nosek et al., 2015). In 2020, CoS launched the TOP Factor to assess the degree to which journal policies are promoting transparency and reproducibility. The TOP Factor is based on the TOP Guidelines, e.g. transparency of data/code/materials/research design and pre-registration. The TOP Factor is calculated by summing the level of implementation of the 8 original standards plus 2 additional standards (CoS).
The Web of Science Core Collection is a global, multidisciplinary citation index widely used for scientometric analysis. The list of journals in Core Collection is available on the Web of Science Master Journal List (Clarivate). The Core Collection includes 21,879 active journals as of January 2022, covering sciences, social sciences, and arts & humanities. These journals pass a rigorous editorial selection process (Clarivate).
In 2020, Clarivate collaborated with the Center for Open Science to incorporate TOP Factors on the Master Journal List (Clarivate). As of February 2022, 1,232 of the Core Collection’s journals (5.6%) have a TOP Factor. Previous studies have analyzed TOP Factor for journals in specific disciplines, including sleep research and chronobiology (Spitschan et al., 2020), herpetology (Marshall & Strine, 2021), and sport science (Hansford et al.), (Hansford et al., 2022), (Hansford et al., 2021). Other studies have found a positive correlation between open data sharing, one aspect of open science, and citation impact (Piwowar et al., 2007), (Piwowar & Vision, 2013). This study explores the relationship between TOP Factor and journal impact measures across all research disciplines.
More information
Ann Beynon
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate, United States
The flow of ideas across geographies is essential for a healthy research ecosystem. Graduate students are vital to research universities, and these researchers often stay in their adopted country as postdocs and eventually faculty members. Established researchers move to universities in other countries or establish joint appointments across borders. Prior studies have shown the benefits of this cross-pollination to research and innovation outcomes (Halevi et al. 2015). Countries are in a fierce competition to attract and retain the best research talent. The COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical forces have altered the flow of researchers in recent years. In this study, we examine the mobility of Canadian researchers using Web of Science Core Collection publication data representing over 21,000 international journals. Author affiliations in three research fields- virology, finance, and environmental science- were analyzed to track researcher mobility across countries and over a ten-year period (2012-2021). We analyzed the rate of mobility for Canadian researchers versus other countries in these three fields, and examined the countries and institutions globally where the Canadian researchers migrated to. Mobility rates across sectors (academic, government, corporate, etc.) are also compared over the ten-year period. The data show there are field and country differences in mobility patterns which warrants further investigation. These data can help university leaders and government policy makers understand changes occurring in the Canadian research workforce and inform their funding and policy decisions to sustain and strengthen the national research system.
More information
Milovan Kovač, Ross W. K. Potter
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
Analysing researchers’ mobility is an important step toward understanding global research patterns and what drives researchers to move institutions, countries or leave academia. Here, an analysis of researchers’ mobility during the years 2012 to 2021 was conducted through the lens of researchers’ academic age. Data from three subject categories (finance, oceanography, and virology), where researchers are expected to publish under different affiliation types, were used. Changes in affiliation types (academic, corporate, government, etc.) throughout researchers’ publishing careers were tracked. The results show that over 80% of authors did not change affiliation type over their career. However, of those authors that did exhibit changes, researchers were more likely to stop publishing completely with an affiliation type rather than adding a new type as their career progressed. At a country level, a comparison between authors initially affiliated with China and USA shows that, depending on the research field, authors initially affiliated with USA gradually stopped publishing under USA affiliations as their academic age increases. This effect was greater than that for initially Chinese affiliated authors in some subject fields.
More information
Ross Potter, Milovan Kovac
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
Category Normalized Citation Impact (CNCI) allows comparisons between research in different fields and is considered a standard indicator for national and institutional comparisons. Fractional and Collaboration CNCI supplement the standard approach by considering the increasingly collaborative nature of scientific research. Here, these three CNCI variants are combined to analyse changes in these indicator values over the period 2009 to 2018 for nearly 200 institutions. Using Web of Science data, Chinese institutions are found to be extremely consistent in improvements across all three CNCI indicators with an almost 1:1 nature, while USA and Canadian institutions tend to show declines in values for all three indicator variants. Specific institutions, such as King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia, stand out as being regionally exceptional in their CNCI values. Analysis also demonstrates the increasingly collaborative nature of research, with the mean number of institutional partners for both domestic and international collaboration increasing over time. Chinese institutions’ unique improvement may be due to Chinese citation practices. Specific institutional improvements may be due to hiring policies. Further work is required to fully address how greater collaboration, as well as research portfolios, affect CNCI indicator values and, therefore, performance evaluation and understanding.
More information
Ryan Beardsley, Gali Halevi
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
Caroline Wagner
The Ohio State University
In recent years special attention was given to identify gaps in scientific productivity and impact between women en men. These studies contributed to our understanding of how social, economic, inequity, and gaps in career opprtunities contributed to the increasing gaps in advancement, productivity and impact between men and women in science. In this study we focused on tracking the differences between men en women’s productivity and impact with the same academic age, single autorship in the same disciplines. We sought to demonstrate the dynamics of females and males’ publications and impact over time by analyzing number of publications and citations by academic age and by selected discipline. Our contribution is mainly the addition of two parameters: academic age and single authorship analysis.
Our finding show, that except for Nursing, which is already dominated by female authors, all the disciplines we studies showed that male authors receive more citations as single authors than females. This study demonstrates that gaps in impact exist even when single authorship and academic age are identical. This is concerning since these gaps seem to be inscribed from early career and as previous studies showed, continue through the scientific careers of females and males.
More information
Gali Halevi , Nemanja Milicevic, Ryan Fry
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
Wenceslao Arroyo-Machado, Daniel Torres-Salinas, and Nicolas Robinson-García
University of Granada, Spain
The median age of scientists and engineers in the US has increased from 40.3 years in 2003 to 42.4 years in 2017, while the proportion of those aged 55 and over has risen from 19% to 27%, according to a report by the National Science Foundation. Factors contributing to the trend include longer life expectancy and decreased numbers of younger people entering the workforce due to high education costs and a lack of job opportunities. The aging workforce risks losing the expertise and knowledge of older scientists, and this could hamper scientific progress and innovation. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are universal goals for sustainable development adopted by all member states. Considering the challenges of an aging scientific workforce seen in the NSF data on the one hand, and the global importance of SDGs-related science on the other, this study demonstrates the academic age of researchers in Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America, and North America based on their regional SDG priorities. Researchers have been categorized by their academic age, as measured by their years of experience in academia and their publication records, to identify which countries need more early-career researchers and in which areas of SDGs research. Our preliminary findings show an aging scientific workforce in the Global North with differences in prioritizing SDGs by region and the average academic age of scholars working in each SDG. As a result, we have developed an interactive dashboard that allows users to explore the complete dataset: https://compare-project.eu/tool/academic-age-and-sdgs-worldwide
More information
Ross Potter
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
International collaboration is now integral to academic research, with the Collaboration Category Normalised Citation Impact (Collab CNCI) indicator formulated to specifically account for this. Here, Collab CNCI is used independently, as well as in concert with other CNCI variants (the standard method and fractional counting), to derive and showcase important and otherwise hidden insights into three countries’ (Australia, China Mainland, Sri Lanka) research output. By deconstructing output into different collaboration types, as well as analysing data at both national and institutional levels, highly multilateral papers are shown to directly influence and in some cases (Sri Lanka) dominate a country’s CNCI performance. Such information is critical to be able to fully understand and responsibly compare research performance and consequently drive better informed policy and funding decisions.
More info
Gali Halevi, Nemanja Milićević, Ryan Fry
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
Thed van Leeuwen
The Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University
Open access publishing has quite a significant cost associated with it. Article Processing Charges (APCs) are fees charged by publishers to authors for the publication of their articles in open access journals. These fees can present a new type of “paywall” to researchers and institutions who cannot afford to pay these amounts. Considering previous studies that showed barriers to publishing open access between countries as a result of high costs, in this study, we aimed to examine whether there are differences in open access publishing, expenditure and overall participation within universities in the United States. Our analysis shows that the majority of states published between 1,000 – 7,000 Gold Open Access publications and spent up to 6million dollars in the past 10 years. However, there are some noteworthy outliers’ states that publish a high number Gold Open Access papers but pay significantly less than other states that publish a lower number of Gold Open Access papers and pay significantly more.
More information
Ross Potter
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
Funding is imperative for academic research and can be provided by, among others, governments and private companies. Here, using a dataset of ~245,000 research articles sourced from the Web of Science and Incites Benchmarking & Analytics over the period 2016 to 2021 inclusive, funding for Nordic-authored research is analysed. The dominant funding source (~80% of all articles) is from countries within the European Union (EU). However, on a continent level, only funding from Asia, specifically China, increases in terms of percentage share over the period (14% to 19%). Within the EU, the main funding source (30% of all articles) is the European Commission, as well as countries’ own research councils or academies (particularly Sweden, Norway and Finland). Outside the EU, funding from US government health bodies (e.g., National Institute of Health – NIH) is prominent but has decreased (12% to 9.5%). Funding from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) has also declined (10.5% to 7.5%) over the period, possibly a consequence of Brexit. Notably, the impact of Nordic research declines over the period – all top 10 funders (by publication count) saw their Category Normalised Citation Impact (CNCI) stagnate or decrease, particularly UKRI and NIH whose values halved from above 6 to around 3. Using Citation Topics to define research areas, forty percent of funded research covers Clinical and Life Sciences. This is the most funded area for all 10 largest funders, bar the National Natural Science Foundation of China and National Science Foundation where Physics is the most funded area.
More information
Ross Potter, Milovan Kovac
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
Using publication data between 2012 and 2021, this work examines the institutional and geographic mobility of researchers initially affiliated with a Nordic institution in 2012. Data are retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) and contain information for more than 70,000 researchers. More than four fifths (84%) of these authors have multiple institutional affiliations, while more than half (56%) added a new institution to their initial affiliation list. Roughly 37% of Nordic authors have more than one affiliated country, while 29% added new a country affiliation after 2012. Furthermore, researchers from all Nordic countries tend to gradually leave their initial affiliated country as their career progresses. Iceland has the greatest drain of researchers. It is the only Nordic country where less than 70% of its authors remained affiliated with an Icelandic institution in 2021. USA, UK and Germany are in the top tier of foreign affiliated countries of Nordic researchers. At the same time, many Nordic researchers are affiliated with other Nordic countries. Sweden stands out as an important mobility destination for authors from other Nordic countries. Sweden is in the top three mobility destinations for all other Nordic countries except for Denmark. In terms of institution affiliation types (i.e., academic, government, corporate), there were no significant shifts of authors from one affiliation type to another when comparing distributions in 2012 and 2021.
More information
Ross Potter
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
An analysis of Web of Science Core Collection data used to explore research trends in global ocean science. Examples from this recently published bibliometric analysis will illustrate publishing trends for the world’s five ocean basins, focusing on national and institutional-level activity and collaboration trends. We also covered recent additions to Web to Science: Preprint Citation Index and ProQuest Dissertations and These Citation Index.
More information
Ann Beynon
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
Laurel Crawford
Johns Hopkins University
Shawn Hendrikx
Western University
Academic research libraries have been building their open access strategies for decades in response to government-led OA policies balanced with their institutional principles and values. As these mandates take shape, such as the Canadian Tri-Agency OA Policy and the OSTP Public Access Memo (2022 Nelson Memo) in the US, librarians are seeking ways to help support OA publishing and compliance at their organization. At the same time, they also endeavor to build a values-inclusive framework that considers both quantitative results and the institution’s principles. In this session, librarians from Johns Hopkins University and Western University will discuss how they use bibliometric data to support a balanced decision-making approach when it comes to publishing-support solutions, e.g., publisher partnerships or transformative agreements.
Through analyses in Web of Science™ and InCites Benchmarking & Analytics™, libraries can quickly understand the current OA publishing trends among their researchers–one piece of the OA initiative puzzle. Attendees of this session will learn techniques for compiling reports that help librarians uncover which researchers and departments are particularly engaged with OA already or what the university’s gold OA output looks like by publisher portfolio. With trusted Clarivate™ tools available at many institutions, librarians can start tackling some of their biggest questions related to OA, and non-OA publishing alike, at their organization.
More information
Ross Potter, Milovan Kovac
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
Category Normalized Citation Impact (CNCI) allows comparisons between research in different fields and is considered a standard indicator for national and institutional comparisons. Fractional and Collaboration CNCI supplement the standard approach by considering the increasingly collaborative nature of scientific research. Here, these three CNCI variants are combined to analyse changes in these indicator values over the period 2009 to 2018 for nearly 200 institutions. Using Web of Science data, Chinese institutions are found to be extremely consistent in improvements across all three CNCI indicators with an almost 1:1 nature, while USA and Canadian institutions tend to show declines in values for all three indicator variants. Specific institutions, such as King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia, stand out as being regionally exceptional in their CNCI values. Analysis also demonstrates the increasingly collaborative nature of research, with the mean number of institutional partners for both domestic and international collaboration increasing over time. Chinese institutions’ unique improvement may be due to Chinese citation practices. Specific institutional improvements may be due to hiring policies. Further work is required to fully address how greater collaboration, as well as research portfolios, affect CNCI indicator values and, therefore, performance evaluation and understanding.
Ryan Beardsley*, Caroline Wagner**, Gali Halevi*
* Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
** The Ohio State University
In recent years special attention was given to identify gaps in scientific productivity and impact between women and men. These studies contributed to our understanding of how social, economic, inequity, and gaps in career opportunities contributed to the increasing gaps in advancement, productivity and impact between men and women in science. In this study we focused on tracking the differences between men and women’s productivity and impact with the same academic age, single authorship in the same disciplines. We sought to demonstrate the dynamics of females and males’ publications and impact over time by analyzing number of publications and citations by academic age and by selected discipline. Our contribution is mainly the addition of two parameters: academic age and single authorship analysis. Our finding show, that except for Nursing, which is already dominated by female authors, all the disciplines we studies showed that male authors receive more citations as single authors than females. This study demonstrates that gaps in impact exist even when single authorship and same academic age are identical. This is concerning since these gaps seem to be inscribed from early career and as previous studied showed, continue through the scientific careers of females and males
Ross Potter
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate, United States
International collaboration is now integral to academic research, with the Collaboration Category Normalised Citation Impact (Collab CNCI) indicator formulated to specifically account for this. Here, Collab CNCI is used independently, as well as in concert with other CNCI variants (the standard method and fractional counting), to derive and showcase important and otherwise hidden insights into three countries’ (Australia, China Mainland, Sri Lanka) research output. By deconstructing output into different collaboration types, as well as analysing data at both national and institutional levels, highly multilateral papers are shown to directly influence and in some cases (Sri Lanka) dominate a country’s CNCI performance. Such information is critical to be able to fully understand and responsibly compare research performance and consequently drive better informed policy and funding decisions.
Gali Halevi* , Thed van Leeuwen** Nemanja Milićević, *** Ryan Fry****
*Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate, United States
**The Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, NL
Open access publishing has quite a significant cost associated with it. Article Processing Charges (APCs) are fees charged by publishers to authors for the publication of their articles in open access journals. These fees can present a new type of “paywall” to researchers and institutions who cannot afford to pay these amounts. Considering previous studies that showed barriers to publishing open access between countries as a result of high costs, in this study, we aimed to examine whether there are differences in open access publishing, expenditure and overall participation within universities in the United States. Our analysis shows that the majority of states published between 1,000 – 7,000 Gold Open Access publications and spent up to 6million dollars in the past 10 years. However, there are some noteworthy outliers’ states that publish a high number Gold Open Access papers but pay significantly less than other states that publish a lower number of Gold Open Access papers and pay significantly more.
Ross Potter, Milovan Kovac
Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate
Using publication data between 2012 and 2021, this work examines the institutional and geographic mobility of researchers initially affiliated with a Nordic institution in 2012. Data are retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) and contain information for more than 70,000 researchers. More than four fifths (84%) of these authors have multiple institutional affiliations, while more than half (56%) added a new institution to their initial affiliation list. Roughly 37% of Nordic authors have more than one affiliated country, while 29% added new a country affiliation after 2012. Furthermore, researchers from all Nordic countries tend to gradually leave their initial affiliated country as their career progresses. Iceland has the greatest drain of researchers. It is the only Nordic country where less than 70% of its authors remained affiliated with an Icelandic institution in 2021. USA, UK and Germany are in the top tier of foreign affiliated countries of Nordic researchers. At the same time, many Nordic researchers are affiliated with other Nordic countries. Sweden stands out as an important mobility destination for authors from other Nordic countries. Sweden is in the top three mobility destinations for all other Nordic countries except for Denmark. In terms of institution affiliation types (i.e., academic, government, corporate), there were no significant shifts of authors from one affiliation type to another when comparing distributions in 2012 and 2021.
Please be advised that recently there have been fraudulent job offers and interviews using the Clarivate name, logo and even names of our colleagues.
Please be aware that Clarivate will:
If you have any question about a position posted in our company name, please check our current open positions on the Clarivate website Careers pages or contact one of our recruiting team members directly.
If you have been the victim of a scam, please contact your local law enforcement agency.
This link leads to the machine-readable files that are made available in response to the federal Transparency in Coverage Rule and includes negotiated service rates and out-of-network allowed amounts between health plans and healthcare providers. The machine-readable files are formatted to allow researchers, regulators, and application developers to more easily access and analyze data.
View now

source

About The Author