ScienceDirect AI tool ‘could halve time spent on literature research’ – Times Higher Education

Resources for
academics and university staff
Everything you need for each step
of your study abroad journey
Publishing giant Elsevier claims its new artificial intelligence tool could cut the amount of time researchers have to spend searching academic literature by as much as half.
The firm has launched ScienceDirect AI, which is designed to instantly generate summaries of content drawn from 14 million full-text articles and book chapters hosted on the ScienceDirect platform.
The tool includes a “reading assistant”, allowing scholars to ask further questions of a content summary or a document that it references, and a “compare experiments” features, which creates a table breaking down each experiment detailed in a set of articles, comparing their methods and results.
More than 30,000 researchers and librarians from 70 universities and research organisations helped to test and develop the tool. “Building on the feedback received, the tool can save 50 per cent of time spent on literature research,” Elsevier said.
Studies have indicated that researchers spend between a quarter and a third of their time sifting through literature looking for the material that they need.
ScienceDirect AI is the latest in a series of tools designed to aid this process, but its association with the ScienceDirect database and the publishing giant which operates it is likely to make it a major player.
It follows the launch of Scopus AI in January 2024, linked to the database of abstracts of the same name and designed to give fast overviews of key topics.
Elsevier said that ScienceDirect AI would provide “clear links to sources of information and claims, including exact passages within research articles”, and was “purposefully built to ensure accuracy and reduce the risk of hallucinations and biases”.
Judy Verses, Elsevier’s president of academic and government markets, said that the new tool could be a “gamechanger for researchers who are grappling with information overload”.
“ScienceDirect is the platform of choice globally for millions of researchers, so this new generative AI tool will seamlessly integrate into their current ways of working, enabling them to dedicate more time to research and achieve results,” she said.
chris.havergal@timeshighereducation.com
Why register?
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login
Rise of robot-written summaries should push publishers to articulate value and impact of research more clearly, argues Oxford University Press director
Academics tell Elsevier that they recognise the potential of generative AI but want to see their concerns addressed
Scopus AI will be ‘valuable tool’ for researchers seeking to explore academic disciplines and study areas, says leading publisher
Publishers of big journals ramp up efforts to ensure more transparency over what material has been fed into the likes of ChatGPT
Government drive to boost research commercialisation struggles to get off the ground at public universities
The administration’s hostile edicts on DEI and science funding are sending shock waves through the US’ world-leading higher education system. Five US academics give their perspectives
Rise of robot-written summaries should push publishers to articulate value and impact of research more clearly, argues Oxford University Press director
Recording gender identity but not sex perpetuates historical exclusion of women from research, paper argues
Subscribe to Times Higher Education
As the voice of global higher education, THE is an invaluable daily resource. Subscribe today to receive unlimited news and analyses, commentary from the sharpest minds in international academia, our influential university rankings analysis and the latest insights from our World Summit series.

source

About The Author

admin

See author's posts