Africa needs mineral security, too – 코리아타임스

1
US Postal Service suspends incoming packages from China, Hong Kong
3
Netflix’s ‘When Life Gives You Tangerines’ debuts March 7
5
Everland, Sanrio team up again for spring festival
7
Intimate scenes in ‘When the Stars Gossip’ fall flat
9
Mnet draws criticism for failing to properly interpret Lady Gaga’s pro-LGBTQ+ message at Grammys
11
BLACKPINK to launch new world tour this year
13
BLACKPINK’s Jisoo to embark on fan meet tour after release of ‘AMORTAGE’
15
INTERVIEWUkraine open to talks with South Korea on captured NK soldiers: envoy
17
Ban on online sales of soju, beer sparks complaints amid surge in imported alcohol
19
In shock announcement, Trump says US wants to take over Gaza Strip
2
DJ Koo to return to Taiwan with late wife Barbie Hsu’s remains
4
Chinese netizens use DeepSeek to copy Barbie Hsu’s style in mourning letters
6
Korea targets to welcome 18.5 million foreign visitors in 2025, up 13% from 2024
8
INTERVIEW‘The Trauma Code’ propels Choo Young-woo to stardom
10
Gyeongju faces accommodation crunch as APEC summit approaches
12
Morning temperatures drop to minus 11.8 degrees Celsius in Seoul; frigid cold to continue for time being
14
Anthony Mackie forges own path as new Captain America
16
Potential massive fines weigh on Korean telecoms firms
18
Over 85% of Korean women turn to postpartum care centers
20
90 Vietnamese nationals nabbed on drug charges
Close for 24 hours
Daniel M. Franks
BRISBANE/BRUSSELS – On February 3-6, policymakers and industry leaders will gather in Cape Town for the annual Investing in African Mining Indaba. At the top of their agenda will be Africa’s reserves of critical minerals and how the continent can capitalize on their role in the global economy.
Africa has long served as one of the world’s primary suppliers of raw materials, making it a focal point of resource diplomacy and geopolitical competition. In 2024, the European Union adopted the Critical Raw Materials Act, which aims to secure greater access to the continent’s resources in exchange for a larger role in local processing and a development pathway aligned with political roadmaps like the Africa Mining Vision.
Yet a recurring question will be asked in the halls of Cape Town’s International Convention Centre: To whom are these resources critical? In the context of raw materials and minerals, the term “critical” is often associated with the energy transition. In fact, a mineral is considered critical for two main reasons, both of which have little to do with promoting renewable energy: it is economically important and difficult to substitute, and its supply is at risk of disruption.
Ruya Perincek
Both criteria depend on one’s perspective: to whose economy the minerals are important and whose supply chains are at risk. The EU already has robust supply chains for most minerals, so it takes a highly selective approach. In addition to energy-transition minerals like lithium and cobalt, its list of critical raw materials includes beryllium (used in missile guidance systems), tantalum (used in capacitors and electronics), and even commodities in direct contrast to the energy transition, like coking coal.
But suppose we asked a different question: What are the mineral security needs of Africa? From the perspective of the Global South and the world’s poorest populations, a list of critical raw materials would look radically different. It would include minerals essential for human security – cement for housing and infrastructure, fertilizers for agriculture, salt for nutrition and food preservation, chlorine for water purification and fluorspar for fluoridation.
Seen through this lens, mineral security is less about national security and capturing greater benefits from extraction, and more about access, affordability, and sufficiency for all. Just as food security is understood as universal nutrition, mineral security must support universal needs – shelter, mobility, communication, energy, and sustenance.
Building local value chains tailored to Africa’s needs will be vital for the continent’s mineral security. For example, Africa produces 30 million tons of mineral fertilizer annually but exports most of it, accounting for just 3-4 percent of global consumption – a consequence of high costs and complex supply chains. Crushed rocks offer a promising alternative source of crop nutrients, with the added benefit of capturing carbon dioxide. In Brazil, the Rochagem movement has pioneered the use of local rocks, cutting costs by up to 80 percent while producing crop yields equal to or higher than those obtained with conventional fertilizers.
Similarly, Africa consumes only 5 percent of global cement production despite accounting for 18 percent of the world’s population. The high cost of imported clinker cement impedes economic development, weakens housing and transportation infrastructure, slows recovery efforts following natural disasters, and limits African countries’ ability to protect coastlines from the effects of climate change. Alternatives like limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) can be produced locally from abundant clay resources with up to 25 percent lower costs and 40 percent lower carbon emissions.
Affordable access to globally integrated, mineral-based products like solar panels and batteries remains particularly elusive. The Democratic Republic of the Congo, for example, produces 72 percent of the world’s cobalt, a key component of lithium-ion batteries. But Africa is projected to account for just 0.1 percent of the global market by 2030.
This problem extends beyond Africa. Between 2002 and 2022, Latin American countries like Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia exported 1,980 kilotons of lithium, yet only 13 kilotons – less than 1 percent – returned to the region embedded in finished goods.
Innovative approaches, such as “materials as a service” schemes that promote leasing rather than selling raw materials, could help bridge these gaps by enabling mineral-producing countries to collect royalties at every stage of processing and production. Building on this approach, policymakers could also require end-product manufacturers to sell finished goods back at affordable prices.
To implement such programs, support from advanced economies, particularly in Europe, will be crucial. Technical cooperation and assistance will be especially important to promote human-centered mineral security, because the minerals sector receives just under $600 million out of the $239 billion spent on official development assistance globally in 2021.
To secure lasting access to critical raw materials, the EU must go beyond simply offering African countries a bigger role in processing minerals that will ultimately be exported. Instead, it must help create a fairer model of mineral security – one that emphasizes affordability and self-sufficiency, thereby enabling Africa to meet its own development needs.
Daniel M. Franks is professor at the University of Queensland and Director of the Sustainable Minerals Institute’s Global Centre for Mineral Security. Rüya Perincek, a policy fellow at the Willy Brandt School of Public Policy at the University of Erfurt, is an adjunct senior fellow at the Global Centre for Mineral Security. This article was distributed by Project Syndicate.
Bayern Munich beat Tottenham Hotspur in Seoul
Tottenham 4-3 K-League All-Stars
World Water Day 2024
Busan World Team Table Tennis Championships Finals
Super Bowl 2024

source

About The Author

admin

See author's posts